[CBFF] 4 Bears on "Best Team Money Can Buy" (ESPN: Clayton)

[Matt Langschwager]

I disagree.  I think the NFC North will be a repeat of 2002, except with Chicago running away with it by November instead of GB.  The key is to not slack off in the final weeks like GB did (and end up losing at home in playoffs for the first time EVER!  To Atlanta of all teams.  And it wasn't even close!  HAHAHA  Oh man, that loss practically made up for the whole crummy Champaign season...) uh, where was I again?  Oh yeah, what I was trying to say is that we need that first round bye.
   
  But I'm thinking Vikes 6-10, Lions 4-12, Pack 3-13 or worse.
   
  Matt

Jerry Madsen <jerrywm at gmail.com> wrote:
  I think Jan hit it on the head: Not only will the NFC North not be one of
the weakest, it may actually be one of the most competitive divisions in
06. I expect the Packers to suck, but with both improved offences and
defenses, I expect the Lions and the Queens to give a lot of teams fits:
that includes the Bears.

I'm not saying we should pencil them in for the playoffs now, but barring
significant injuries, why shouldn't we expect both teams to average if not
better?

Jerry


On 7/14/06, Jan van der Laan wrote:
>
> And personally i didn't like the reference he made to
> win the NFC North with his backups. Come on: this
> division is not the weakest one in the league.
> Look af the NFC West which didn't put up any winning
> record last year, except Seahawks.
> We at least had 2 teams with winning records.
>
> What I do like is the common opinion that Green Bay
> SUCKS BIG TIME. Always love hearing that
>


-- 
http://blog.chicagobearsfanforum.com
_______________________________________________
Check out the CBFF Blog:
blog.chicagobearsfanforum.com
CBFF Homepage:
www.chicagobearsfanforum.com


 		
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
 Everyone is raving about the  all-new Yahoo! Mail Beta.