[CBFF] Its magic!
Matt Langschwager
matthewindc at yahoo.com
Mon May 1 07:39:01 MDT 2006
I agree here about the WRs. If we learned anything from the David Terrell experience, rookie WRs don't usually jump in and immediately learn the offense/make a big difference. Drafting one would have simply thrown another contender into our unproven pile. At least Currie, Bradley, Berrian, etc have been around the system for at least a year.
Matt
Jerry Madsen <jerrywm at gmail.com> wrote:
I agree with ya and I don't on this one Steve. I think the Bears
should have snagged a TE in the draft. Not sure why Angelo didn't.
Seems as if he out-thought himself when you listen to him address the
media.
Wide receiver, on the other hand, seemed a lot less pressing to me.
There is some depth there once we get a little health. Some have
suggested that Devin Hester may have been an offensive pick and could
bolster those ranks.
Just my two cents on a Monday morning.
Jerry
--
http://www.BloggedDrain.com
On 4/30/06, Stephen Lake wrote:
> I agree that the grades are a joke but the problem is that Angelo
> failed to address two key need areas--WR and TE--when quality was
> available at each position in round 2.
>
_______________________________________________
Chicago Bears Fan Forum
post at chicagobearsfanforum.com
---------------------------------
How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messengers low PC-to-Phone call rates.
More information about the CBFF
mailing list