[CBFF] The 57th

[Victor Waldron]

This whole thread is why I have such mixed feelings on this last
draft. We have three young talented WRs who haven't been able to show
much because of injury yet all should be ready to go for the start of
training camp. The knee-jerk reaction would be to grab a WR in the
draft, and even I thought we should've taken at least one, but the
reality is it would have created a crowded situation.

Maybe, *if* the Grossman story is true (about Currie) and *if* JA and
Lovie have faith in his evaluation then *perhaps* that lead them away
from adding a WR this past weekend. We already know that Grossman
likes Moose and Berrian and we've seen a little of what Bradley can
do. With Currie that's four guys already.

The intestesting thing about all is it was the D that let us down in
the playoff game, not the offense. I'm sure that weighed on JA's mind
as well.

V

On 5/1/06, Dwayne <dwayne at wctc.net> wrote:
> Thats cool.
>
> But I would like to add A.Currie to my list. Did anyone read the blurb on
> Grossmans take of Currie? I guess the two are working out with each other,
> and Grossman states he has never played/thrown with anyone quicker.
>
> Dare I say a heathy Currie in this years draft goes in the second round?
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ryan Dietzenbach" <ryandietzenbach at gmail.com>
> To: <post at chicagobearsfanforum.com>
> Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 8:46 AM
> Subject: Re: [CBFF] The 57th
>
>
> > On 5/1/06, Dwayne <dwayne at wctc.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > I think we will have a kick ass offense next year.
> > > 1. We have stability at QB.
> > > 2. Intact starting offensive line, with depth.
> > > 3. Benson
> > > 4. Bradley/Berrian, and the Moose.
> > > 5. T. Jones.
> >
> >
> >
> > Does "stability" mean "ability" or production?
> >
> > Our OL is aging and I don't see much depth.
> >
> > Benson has proven little.
> >
> > Bradley is coming off a serious knee injury.  Moose stunk last year, IMHO.
> >
> > Thomas Jones...He's good.
> >
> > Just playing Devil's Advocate.  ;-)
> >
> > RD