[CBFF] CT - Bears ignored nee... blah blah blah

[Victor Waldron]

I guess the thing is that JA had guys he liked so he took them, and I
have little doubt about his judgement in that regard. My agreement
with Landry is that we probably could have gotten the same with lower
picks (Hester in particular). Blah, blah, blah versus coulda woulda
shoulda.....I think we've worked the whole thing out.

V

On 5/5/06, Jerry Madsen <jerrywm at gmail.com> wrote:
> Angelo is a pud.  But I trust his ability to draft; particularly
> defense.  Landry has his opinion but it means nothing more than blah,
> blah, blah at this point.
>
> Jerry
>
>
> On 5/5/06, Victor Waldron <victor19 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > This is by far the worst indicator I've seen that the Bears may have missed
> > > on this draft.  I'm suddenly much more concerned.
> >
> > I am concerned about the draft more than the team itself. The guys
> > picked (especially early) have great ability but are raw in football
> > skills. They're not expected to contribute right away, but it's a bit
> > arrogant to think we couldn't improve certain positions for this
> > coming season.
> >
> > Aside from the TE argument, I think Landry is correct that JA left
> > better players on the board when the Bears' picks came up. Let's just
> > hope Lovie and his staff can turn this perceived raw ability into
> > solid contribution on the field.
> >
> > V
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Chicago Bears Fan Forum
> > post at chicagobearsfanforum.com
> >
>
>
> --
> http://www.BloggedDrain.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chicago Bears Fan Forum
> post at chicagobearsfanforum.com
>