[CBFF] CBFF FFL draft grades

[Jan van der Laan]

Vic,
very well put for a lot of managers. I LMAO reading
some of your thoughts, although i missed a little bit
"looking in the mirror part" for the commish' draft.
Jan
--- Victor Waldron <victor at 19net.org> wrote:

> Keep in mind a few things when looking at the
> grades:
> -These are my grades for your team, since I'm the
> Commish I rule the land.
> -The grades are in no way a prediction on how a team
> will do over the 
> season. The draft is only one facet of season
> success.
> -I tried my best concealing the names of the
> innocent (and in this case 
> the guilty as well).
> -I am mean.
>
-----------------------------------------------------------
> Dutch Bears: C
> Depth at the important RB and WR positions, but
> "depth" and "quality 
> depth" are two different things. Went with old guys
> at WR (Galloway, 
> McCardell). Took Chicago (D) too early in the draft
> with the #24 pick 
> overall leaving plenty of talent on the board. As
> long as Mr. TD is 
> scoring will be a tough team but you hate depending
> on one player over 
> an entire season.
> 
> Wazivok's Goin On??: B+
> No Bears this season?!?!?!? Would have received an
> "A" if he hadn't 
> taken a K (Feely) so early in the draft with so many
> decent skill 
> position players left.
> 
> Battle Sharks: B
> Solid draft considering "the GM" was grillin' at the
> time. Addai might 
> have been a bit of a reach considering he's
> unproven, plus Branch's 
> season is in question. And why two kickers when BYE
> replacements are so 
> readily available?
> 
> Survive (or Parish): C
> Reached on Hasselbeck (#28 overall), old WRs (R.
> Smith, Glenn, 
> Keyshawn), and what's the point of having 3 QBs on
> the roster?
> 
> Verona Beeners: C-
> Got caught up in the round 2 WR run and took Boldin,
> a solid choice but 
> left some good RBs on the board. Overall, weak at RB
> the most important 
> FFL position. A kicker in round 9, zoinks!!
> 
> Limp Ditkas: C+
> Considering the uncertainty surrounding Portis it is
> difficult to argue 
> him being a poor choice at #6 overall. There's no
> true fantasy #1 WR on 
> the roster though Houshmandzadeh could put up good
> numbers. T. Jones 
> might split carries later in the year, Dillon is
> getting old, and Priest 
> is likely done for his career. Where's the
> production going to come from?
> 
> Remember Walter: A-
> The only bad pick was taking Ahman Green at #55
> overall. As long as TO 
> behaves this will be a team to be reckoned with.
> 
> Des Moines Dragons: C
> Solid starting RBs, decent WRs, a resurgent McNair,
> but what possessed 
> this team to pick Shockey and Crumpler in successive
> rounds so early??
> 
> Alvis' Roughrider: D
> No slack for the auto drafter. Dominick Davis,
> kicker in round 7, 
> defense in round 8. Nuf said. There's actually
> acouple very talented 
> players on this team who can have occasional big
> weeks so watch out.
> 
> Manhattan Maulers: A+
> What else can you say other than CBFF FFL 2006
> Champs!!!!
> 
> Iggy's Emus: D+
> This team has no RBs, but has the best WR corp by
> far. Will need Tatum 
> Bell to become starter in Denver, Fred Taylor to not
> actually show his 
> age, and have Marion Barber be the starter in Dallas
> and be a stud. Oh, 
> and an injured kicker in round 7.
> 
> Pam's Team: B
> Looks solid at the starting positions but the bench
> is weak. Picked a 
> kicker in round 7 when adding depth to more
> important postions would 
> have been better.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Check out the CBFF Blog:
> blog.chicagobearsfanforum.com
> CBFF Homepage:
> www.chicagobearsfanforum.com
> 



	
	
		
___________________________________________________________ 
All new Yahoo! Mail "The new Interface is stunning in its simplicity and ease of use." - PC Magazine 
http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html