[CBFF] Bad Superbowl QB performances
Adam Gold
adam.gold3 at verizon.net
Thu Jan 25 10:11:05 MST 2007
You get big points for protecting the ball. The QB rating system does not tell you who's a good QB, although there is a loose correlation. It does tell you who is efficient, i.e. Is he accurate (comp. pct.), can he throw downfield (yards per attempt), can he protect the ball (int. pct.), and can he create points (TD pct.). The reason that Rex had the bad (sub 40) ratings is because of the ints. That's also why he had an Eason like rating of 39 in the first half on Sunday. It's also why he had a great rating in the second half: His comp. pct and TD pct went way up, while is int. pct. stayed the same.
Adam
>
> Much has been made of Rex's 0.0. In Super Bowl XX, Tony Eason was 0-6, 0 yards,
> but no INT's. His rating: 39.58
>
> Grogan came in and was 17-30, 177 1 TD, 2 INT's Rating 57.22
>
>
>---------------------------------
>TV dinner still cooling?
>Check out "Tonight's Picks" on Yahoo! TV.
>_______________________________________________
>Check out the CBFF Blog:
>blog.chicagobearsfanforum.com
>CBFF Homepage:
>www.chicagobearsfanforum.com
More information about the CBFF
mailing list