[CBFF] CBFF Digest, Vol 420, Issue 1

[M. Maheswaran]

Yes, I am hoping that the Bears will keep Brown. His
cap value is not too exorbitant by current standards
and can be part of the DE rotation.

Mahes

--- cbff-request at chicagobearsfanforum.com wrote:

> Send CBFF mailing list submissions to
> 	cbff at chicagobearsfanforum.com
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web,
> visit
> 
>
http://chicagobearsfanforum.com/mailman/listinfo/cbff_chicagobearsfanforum.com
> 
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body
> 'help' to
> 	cbff-request at chicagobearsfanforum.com
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	cbff-owner at chicagobearsfanforum.com
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it
> is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of CBFF digest..."
> 
> 
> Chicago Bears Fan Forum Digest
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. Re: Bears' Brown just exploring trade
> possibilities (Tom Shannon)
>    2. Re: Bears' Brown just exploring trade
> possibilities
>       (Victor Waldron)
> 
> 
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 15:01:44 -0500
> From: "Tom Shannon" <tshanno at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [CBFF] Bears' Brown just exploring
> trade possibilities
> To: <post at chicagobearsfanforum.com>
> Message-ID: <003001c798be$324a3240$96de96c0$@com>
> Keywords: Unprocessed
> Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="us-ascii"
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cbff-bounces at chicagobearsfanforum.com
> [mailto:cbff-
> > bounces at chicagobearsfanforum.com] On Behalf Of
> Victor Waldron
> > Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 11:41 AM
> > To: post at chicagobearsfanforum.com
> > Subject: Re: [CBFF] Bears' Brown just exploring
> trade possibilities
> > 
> > I find this interesting. While Anderson was good
> as a situational pass
> > rusher we haven't seen much of what he can do
> against the run. Brown
> > is solid if unspectacular against the run which is
> why I wouldn't be
> > too keen on trading him unless........
> > 
> > .........we were to somehow obtain a top tier WR
> for him. Given the
> > fact we just played in the SB we need someone who
> can step in right
> > away, not draft picks.
> 
> I wouldn't have a big problem with this but I feel
> compelled to mention that
> good DE's are tougher to find than good WRs.
> 
> My guess is that Brown is operating under the false
> assumption that he'll
> get more sacks, etc... if he gets more playing time.
>  IMO, not true.  He'll
> get more sacks if he's fresh in the fourth quarter
> going against some left
> tackle who has been on the field all day.  The Bears
> also obviously operate
> under this assumption on the defensive line.
> 
> Tom S.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 15:22:43 -0500
> From: "Victor Waldron" <victor19 at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [CBFF] Bears' Brown just exploring
> trade possibilities
> To: post at chicagobearsfanforum.com
> Message-ID:
> 
>
<2265aee00705171322l9f23d81x2518d694a1a15bda at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1;
> format=flowed
> 
> On 5/17/07, Tom Shannon <tshanno at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > I wouldn't have a big problem with this but I feel
> compelled to mention that
> > good DE's are tougher to find than good WRs.
> >
> 
> Which is why if we have a surplus of DEs then we
> should get a good WR in return.
> 
> That said, I realize that you probably meant by your
> comment that we
> might be better served by hanging onto our
> established DEs.
> 
> V
> 
> 
> 
> End of CBFF Digest, Vol 420, Issue 1
> ************************************
> 



 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Now that's room service!  Choose from over 150,000 hotels
in 45,000 destinations on Yahoo! Travel to find your fit.
http://farechase.yahoo.com/promo-generic-14795097