[CBFF] Incites | A McNabb trade (in theory)

[Phil DeNomme]

I was talking about Olsen.

-----Original Message-----
From: cbff-bounces at chicagobearsfanforum.com
[mailto:cbff-bounces at chicagobearsfanforum.com] On Behalf Of Victor Waldron
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 8:08 PM
To: post at chicagobearsfanforum.com
Subject: Re: [CBFF] Incites | A McNabb trade (in theory)

Before Hester is one of the main guys in any formation he has to prove
he can run effective routes and catch the ball. Otherwise having him
out there is pretty useless.

V

On 5/23/07, Phil DeNomme <pdenomme at gmail.com> wrote:
> And word is that he's working hard on improving his blocking.
>
> I think we'll see a lot of a formation like that.  But more with Moose
> instead of Hester.  I think there will be a lot of 2 WR, 2 TE sets this
> year.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cbff-bounces at chicagobearsfanforum.com
> [mailto:cbff-bounces at chicagobearsfanforum.com] On Behalf Of Dwayne
> Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 2:48 PM
> To: post at chicagobearsfanforum.com
> Subject: Re: [CBFF] Incites | A McNabb trade (in theory)
>
> I see a nightmare formation for defense's as alluded to earlier with the
> two te look.
>
> Hester and Berrian split wide, with Clark and Olsen at te, and Benson
> the lone back.

_______________________________________________
Check out the CBFF Blog:
blog.chicagobearsfanforum.com
CBFF Homepage:
www.chicagobearsfanforum.com