[CBFF] Week 9 thoughts about rivals

Victor Waldron victor19 at gmail.com
Mon Nov 5 09:18:26 MST 2007


Well, we've been giving up some big plays so teams are scoring their
TDs against us without originating from the redzone. So we are good at
defending the redzone......if we haven't already given up a TD (I'm
sure there's really more to it than that but based on observation
without the aid of stats that's is what seems to be going on).

V

On Nov 5, 2007 10:26 AM, Phil DeNomme <pdenomme at gmail.com> wrote:
> It amazes me how a team can be #1 in the redzone but blow outside of that.
> Why not just play that tough all the time?  I hate bend but don't break
> defenses.  I want a shut down defense all the time...not just when the other
> team has drove 60 yards and ate up 4 minutes.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cbff-bounces at chicagobearsfanforum.com
> [mailto:cbff-bounces at chicagobearsfanforum.com] On Behalf Of Jerry Madsen
> Sent: Monday, November 05, 2007 8:57 AM
> To: post at chicagobearsfanforum.com
>
> Subject: Re: [CBFF] Week 9 thoughts about rivals
>
> I have to disagree, Chris.  Hanging 44 points on any team doesn't
> entirely by luck.  They've got some potency on offense and they showed
> it yesterday.
>
> Now, going week 8, the Bears were ranked #30 in yards given-up, but #1
> in redzone defense; the ultimate "rubber band" D.  And that's what it
> took to limit the Lions to 16 points, so obviously the Bears still
> have some bite and the Lions still have some growing to do.  But that
> aside, if the discover your vulnerabilities, they'll make ya pay.
>
> As for their special teams being awful.  I don't know much about their
> return game or punting, but Jason Hanson is anything but awful.  In
> fact, he's pretty damn good, IMHO.
>
> Jerry
>
>
> On 11/5/07, mactbone <mactbone0 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > The offense is mediocre, the defense is pretty bad and the special teams
> are awful. Playing bad teams and having good luck has got them six wins, but
> that's not going to last. They might make the playoffs because the NFC is
> weak and they already have six wins (although Minn. has been there a few
> times and missed) but when they play one of the better NFC teams they won't
> look as good.
> > -Chris
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----
> > From: Jerry Madsen <jerrywm at gmail.com>
> > To: post at chicagobearsfanforum.com
> > Sent: Monday, November 5, 2007 8:52:08 AM
> > Subject: Re: [CBFF] Week 9 thoughts about rivals
> >
> > Ok Chris.  I'll bite.  Why aren't the Lions for real?  Not that I'm
> > convinced one way or the other.  I'm just not sure what to think.
> >
> > Jerry
> >
> > On 11/5/07, mactbone <mactbone0 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > Packers are for real, Lions are not.
> > > -Chris
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Check out the CBFF Blog:
> > blog.chicagobearsfanforum.com
> > CBFF Homepage:
> > www.chicagobearsfanforum.com
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > Check out the CBFF Blog:
> > blog.chicagobearsfanforum.com
> > CBFF Homepage:
> > www.chicagobearsfanforum.com
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Check out the CBFF Blog:
> blog.chicagobearsfanforum.com
> CBFF Homepage:
> www.chicagobearsfanforum.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Check out the CBFF Blog:
> blog.chicagobearsfanforum.com
> CBFF Homepage:
> www.chicagobearsfanforum.com
>



More information about the CBFF mailing list