[CBFF] 4 WRs Dressing

[Phil DeNomme]

I think most of his catches were short. That's where the problem is.  He's
not being used to the best of his ability.  The guy runs a sub 4.5 and you
make him run 3 yard routes?

-----Original Message-----
From: cbff-bounces at chicagobearsfanforum.com
[mailto:cbff-bounces at chicagobearsfanforum.com] On Behalf Of Steve Behrens
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 3:16 PM
To: post at chicagobearsfanforum.com
Subject: Re: [CBFF] 4 WRs Dressing

To me it seemed like a very quiet 7.  How many drops did he have?  I'll bet
maybe one... so if you're throwing to a guy and he's catching every ball....
keep throwing to him.  If he went 7 for 7 or 7 for 8... and they didn't
throw to him anymore... why the hell not?  Throw to him until the defense
has to bring help with him, and then maybe somebody else might get open.
There's no law that says a Bears rec'r cant have 10 or more catches in a
game.  The Bears never make anyone pay this way.. it seems like there's a
quota of plays for each position and, by God, their going to make sure they
get them all in.  The concept is glaringly true when you look at what they
did with the RB position, even after Benson came out of the gate red hot.

Turner's an idiot.

-Behr




On 11/20/07, Ryan Dietzenbach <ryandietzenbach at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Nov 20, 2007 1:05 PM, Steve Behrens <steve.behrens at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > And if Olsen caught Seven, then he should have been thrown to 3 times
> and
> > often.  The guy has been productive all year when they've gone to him...
> > why
> > stop?
>
>
>
> Ummm...doesn't 7 catches show they went to him and "didn't stop"?  I also
> don't know of any "quota."
>
> RD
> _______________________________________________
> Check out the CBFF Blog:
> blog.chicagobearsfanforum.com
> CBFF Homepage:
> www.chicagobearsfanforum.com
>
_______________________________________________
Check out the CBFF Blog:
blog.chicagobearsfanforum.com
CBFF Homepage:
www.chicagobearsfanforum.com