[CBFF] Reviews

[Jason Cetina]

I disagree. I think Stokley's catch bounced on the turf. Dierdork and 
Gum-ball were pretending it was obvious by a mile, but they didn't 
really replay it enough to tell for sure. Still, it looked like it hit 
the turf first.

On the other hand, on Rex's fumble, I thought he started to fumble, 
secured it, and then hit the ground (which caused the fumble), in which 
case he was just down.

Whatever. Not the greatest game by the officials. Not sure it affected 
the outcome all that much. I did see some nasty low blocks by the 
Broncos, and one blatant from behind body slam on one of our DBs.
-
Jason

Jim Ferolie wrote:
> That's a rule they instituted a couple of years ago when replay was renewed. 
> If there is an immediate recovery that wouldn't have been affected by they 
> whistle, they get it. And that was the case there.
>
> Actually, we won a review we should not have -- Stokley's first down catch. 
> That was one of the very few incorrect review calls I've seen in Bears games 
> this year, which means that if your premise is true the Bears are just 
> receiving the benefit of bad calls on the field.
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Ryan Dietzenbach" <ryandietzenbach at gmail.com>
>
>
>   
>> How do you give a team the ball when they do not have possession when the
>> whistle blows?  That makes NO SENSE.
>>
>> Also, how come the Bears so rarely come out on the positive end of a
>> review?  They have to lose out on reviews on at least a 2:1 basis or more.
>> When we challenge, we lose.  When the opposition challenges, we lose.
>>
>> RD
>>     
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Check out the CBFF Blog:
> blog.chicagobearsfanforum.com
> CBFF Homepage:
> www.chicagobearsfanforum.com
>