[CBFF] Question for historians/senior members

[emo]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jan van der Laan" <dutchjan_61nl at yahoo.co.uk>


> Halas started the lawsuit because Allen was under contract to March 31,
1968.
> He charged Allen with breach of contract.
>
> The judge Cornelius J. Harrington ruled the contract binding.
> Halas jumped up and said "Your honor, that's all I wanted to prove. I
withdraw my case."

Apparently I need to read a bit more about this, because it makes no sense
to me. Link, anyone?