[CBFF] Question for historians/senior members
Jan van der Laan
dutchjan_61nl at yahoo.co.uk
Mon Sep 3 06:52:27 MDT 2007
I've got no link. I just quoted some material i read in the book.
Jan
----- Original Message ----
From: emo <emolson1 at hotmail.com>
To: post at chicagobearsfanforum.com
Sent: Monday, 3 September, 2007 6:32:36 AM
Subject: Re: [CBFF] Question for historians/senior members
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jan van der Laan" <dutchjan_61nl at yahoo.co.uk>
> Halas started the lawsuit because Allen was under contract to March 31,
1968.
> He charged Allen with breach of contract.
>
> The judge Cornelius J. Harrington ruled the contract binding.
> Halas jumped up and said "Your honor, that's all I wanted to prove. I
withdraw my case."
Apparently I need to read a bit more about this, because it makes no sense
to me. Link, anyone?
_______________________________________________
Check out the CBFF Blog:
blog.chicagobearsfanforum.com
CBFF Homepage:
www.chicagobearsfanforum.com
___________________________________________________________
Want ideas for reducing your carbon footprint? Visit Yahoo! For Good http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/forgood/environment.html
More information about the CBFF
mailing list