[CBFF] This is more bad news, had it been corrected at the time... Brown and DD don't gethurt...IMO

[Steve Behrens]

Personally, I thought it odd that Walker wasn't starting anyway... may have
been giving him some time to work back into shape and learn the plays, plus
a nod to the guy with the most Bears seniority?

We don't fall off except with rotation and staying as fresh as we wanted to
stay.... which could be a factor.

-Behr


On 9/12/07, Phil DeNomme <pdenomme at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Me too.  It's not like they're being replace by completely inexperienced
> guys.  Walker is an 8 year vet and Manning started most last year and has
> some pretty good upside.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cbff-bounces at chicagobearsfanforum.com
> [mailto:cbff-bounces at chicagobearsfanforum.com] On Behalf Of Dwayne
> Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 1:40 PM
> To: post at chicagobearsfanforum.com
> Subject: Re: [CBFF] This is more bad news,had it been corrected at the
> time... Brown and DD don't gethurt...IMO
>
> Made it to the Super Bowl w/o Brown and Harris.
>
> Guys like Tillman, Vasher, Briggs, A.Brown, Anderson, the "Goon" still
> play.
> Plus the harris dude, and.......
> Oh, and that Urlacher guy is still suiting up.
>
> I will take my chances with them. I still like my team. A lot.
> D
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Victor Waldron" <victor19 at gmail.com>
> To: <post at chicagobearsfanforum.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 10:45 AM
> Subject: Re: [CBFF] This is more bad news,had it been corrected at the
> time... Brown and DD don't get hurt...IMO
>
>
> I see what you're saying but to say the chain of events would have
> been altered by the absence of the cables is really a moot point. It
> sucks having lost both players but we have to move forward with a
> solid D still mostly intact. We made it to the SB without Brown last
> season and we can do it again.
>
> V
>
> On 9/11/07, Michael Halatek <tekster420 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > By Kevin Acee and Jay Posner
> >
> >   UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITERS
> >
> >   September 11, 2007
> >   The Chargers were in contact with the NFL early yesterday morning
> about
> the kicks Sunday that the team said hit the cable on which a television
> camera hovers above the field.
> >
> >     Advertisement
> >
> > There was no word out of the league yesterday, but Fox spokesman Dan
> Bell
> said, "We reviewed the tape and saw no evidence that any kickoff or punt
> was
> effected by the camera or its wiring."   Bell also said the camera was set
> up the same way as always. Fox and CBS spokesmen said they'd never had any
> problems with interference.   The same type of camera is used on the
> Sunday
> night game on NBC, which the Chargers will appear on twice and on ESPN's
> Monday night games, which the Chargers appear on Dec. 24.   Mike Scifres
> said his punt in the third quarter - the one that ended up caroming off a
> Bears player and being recovered by the Chargers - nicked the wire. And
> Nate
> Kaeding said his first kickoff hit the wire. Chargers coaches and
> officials
> also said the kicks appeared to hit the wire.
> >
> >
> >
> >   There is a rule covering a kicked ball hitting a camera wire.  The
> ball
> must be re-kicked...
> >
> >   This really sucks.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Check out the CBFF Blog:
> blog.chicagobearsfanforum.com
> CBFF Homepage:
> www.chicagobearsfanforum.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Check out the CBFF Blog:
> blog.chicagobearsfanforum.com
> CBFF Homepage:
> www.chicagobearsfanforum.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Check out the CBFF Blog:
> blog.chicagobearsfanforum.com
> CBFF Homepage:
> www.chicagobearsfanforum.com
>