[CBFF] ProFootballTalk.com - PACKMEN WANT PACMAN? - Sent UsingGoogle Toolbar

[Victor Waldron]

It's been on and off the table.

V

On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 8:32 AM, Phil DeNomme <pdenomme at gmail.com> wrote:
> I thought I heard yesterday that he was traded to the 'Girls?
>
>
>
>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: cbff-bounces at chicagobearsfanforum.com
>  [mailto:cbff-bounces at chicagobearsfanforum.com] On Behalf Of Tom Shannon
>  Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 6:33 AM
>  To: post at chicagobearsfanforum.com
>  Subject: [CBFF] ProFootballTalk.com - PACKMEN WANT PACMAN? - Sent
>  UsingGoogle Toolbar
>
>  ProFootballTalk.com - PACKMEN WANT
>  PACMAN?<http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/01/packmen-want-pacman/>
>
>  PACKMEN WANT
>  PACMAN?<http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/01/packmen-want-pacman/>
>  Posted
>  by Mike Florio on April 1, 2008, 7:11 a.m.
>
>  We need to preface this one by pointing out that it *isn't* an April Fool's
>  gag.  (We're out of the April Fool's Day business for the first time in our
>  six-plus-year history because each year more and more people believe the
>  intentionally phony stories, which undermines our unintentionally phony
>  stories.)
>
>  The Green Bay
>  Packers<http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/01/packmen-want-pacman/#>are
>  interested in Pacman Jones.  Our good friends at
>  *Sporting News *mentioned the possibility in last week's magazine, with the
>  image of a dejected Reggie Wayne on the cover (or, alternatively, he'd just
>  been kicked in the nuts).
>
>   On the surface, the Packers don't need Pacman because they have Al Harris
>  and Charles Woodson.  But Harris will turn 34 in December and Woodson will
>  be 32 in October, so at some point the Packers have to think about going
>  younger.
>
>  Whether the guy who makes it rain will be accepted by the folks who make it
>  cheese remains to be seen.  Many of the Green Bay fans didn't want Randy
>  Moss <http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/01/packmen-want-pacman/#> last
>  year, even though his presence arguably would have been the difference
>  between an NFC title game loss and a Super Bowl triumph.
>
>  And Pacman is an even higher level of turd, so we can't imagine the folks in
>  Green Bay reacting well to Brett
>  Favre's<http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/01/packmen-want-pacman/#>lege
>  nd
>  being followed by Adam Jones.
>
>  On Monday, it was reported that teams other than the Cowboys are interested
>  in Jones.  Those teams have not yet been identified.