[CBFF] Long goodbye -- chicagotribune.com

[Matt Langschwager]

I would consider the following teams as bad as or worse off currently than the Bears: San Fran, Carolina, Atlanta, Minnesota, Baltimore, NY Jets, Miami, and -depending on how you feel about Eli - the Giants.
   
  All of the above could probably be argued by your stipulations, except Miami.  "Veteran starters" be damned; Miami is currently a QB wasteland.  Any one of our three QBs would be an improvement over what the Fins have now.  Unless you're counting that number one pick as a QB already.
  
Tom Shannon <tshanno at gmail.com> wrote:
  

Looking around at the QBs that start for other teams, I consider it highly
unlikely that the Bears would find themselves worse off. I can't think of a
single team with a worse QB situation. I really mean that. There are young
kids who are worse and there are teams with starters who went down who
might, maybe, be worse. But no one has veteran "starters" like the Bears.


       
---------------------------------
Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.