[CBFF] Long goodbye -- chicagotribune.com

[Phil DeNomme]

LMAO.  I just love the 'don't give me stats' bit when it counters an
argument.

To me, more dangerous = putting more points on the board.  Isn't that the
point of the offense?  Or is it just to chuck it long?

-----Original Message-----
From: cbff-bounces at chicagobearsfanforum.com
[mailto:cbff-bounces at chicagobearsfanforum.com] On Behalf Of Victor Waldron
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 12:21 PM
To: post at chicagobearsfanforum.com
Subject: Re: [CBFF] Long goodbye -- chicagotribune.com

I said he was more dangerous, not that he scores more points. I'm not
defending as much as I'm putting into perspective. Anyone could see
that the deep ball went away with Rex. Dangerous=big play threat.

Then again, you could also say Rex is more dangerous to our own team!!!

Don't give me no stats.

V


On Jan 4, 2008 1:17 PM, Phil DeNomme <pdenomme at gmail.com> wrote:
> Points scored per game excluding the 2 games where one started and another
> finished.
>
> Griese: 22.2 in 5 games
> Rex:  18.17 in 6 games
> Orton:  27 in 3 games
>
> To me, that doesn't look like the offense is more dangerous with Rex in
> there...in fact, it's the opposite.
>
> But what's that you say?  There's ST and defensive points to consider.
> Ok...here it is without defensive points and ST scores.
>
> Griese: 20.8 in 5 games
> Rex:  14.67 in 6 games
> Orton:  19.33 in 3 games
>
> A Rex led offense scores a TD less than a Griese led offense and 5 points
> less than an Orton led offense.
>
> But stats, smats....Rex is by far better.

_______________________________________________
Check out the CBFF Blog:
http://chicagobearsfanforum.com/blog
CBFF Homepage:
http://chicagobearsfanforum.com