[CBFF] Long goodbye -- chicagotribune.com

[Phil DeNomme]

Lol.  As they say in Mickey Mouse Clubhouse....

Push...push...push....

:D

-----Original Message-----
From: cbff-bounces at chicagobearsfanforum.com
[mailto:cbff-bounces at chicagobearsfanforum.com] On Behalf Of Victor Waldron
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 12:36 PM
To: post at chicagobearsfanforum.com
Subject: Re: [CBFF] Long goodbye -- chicagotribune.com

Yes, and that's why it's at the end of the equation. Adding a legit
threat should lead to more points (notice the use of the word "should"
as opposed to any other affirmative word).

Between you and I we are pushing this thread toward 300.

V

On Jan 4, 2008 1:32 PM, Phil DeNomme <pdenomme at gmail.com> wrote:
> If that's the case, I'll take the point production over the 'big play
> threat' any day.  At the end of the day, the points on the board is what
> matters.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cbff-bounces at chicagobearsfanforum.com
> [mailto:cbff-bounces at chicagobearsfanforum.com] On Behalf Of Victor Waldron
> Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 12:30 PM
> To: post at chicagobearsfanforum.com
> Subject: Re: [CBFF] Long goodbye -- chicagotribune.com
>
>
> On Jan 4, 2008 1:25 PM, Phil DeNomme <pdenomme at gmail.com> wrote:
> > LMAO.  I just love the 'don't give me stats' bit when it counters an
> > argument.
> >
> > To me, more dangerous = putting more points on the board.  Isn't that
the
> > point of the offense?  Or is it just to chuck it long?
> >
>
> Well, if chucking it long is actually a threat, then is supposedly
> opens up the running game and the middle of the field for passes
> underneath. Take it as a complete package then:
> dangerous=big play threat+spreading the field=putting more points on the
> board.
>
> This is all in theory, of course.
>
> V
>

_______________________________________________
Check out the CBFF Blog:
http://chicagobearsfanforum.com/blog
CBFF Homepage:
http://chicagobearsfanforum.com