[CBFF] [Fwd: Cutting Benson would create no savings for Bears]
Tom Shannon
tshanno at gmail.com
Mon May 5 13:51:01 MDT 2008
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Cutting Benson would create no savings for Bears
Date: Mon, 05 May 2008 18:37:24 GMT
From: <Brad Biggs>
Surely, the Bears are still in an information-gathering mode when it
comes to *Cedric Benson*.
Two days after his arrest on Lake Travis near Austin, Texas, there are
vastly different stories being told by the running back and the Lower
Colorado River Authority. The NFL, no doubt, is also looking into the
matter. While Benson is not in danger of being zapped like *Tank
Johnson* was with an eight-game suspension last year, commissioner
*Roger Goodell* can hand out one-game suspensions like others give out
Halloween candy. They’re not tough to get.
Cutting bait with Benson is not going to create any kind of savings for
the Bears in terms of the salary cap. None at all.
Benson’s salary-cap figure for 2008 is $3.335 million and if the Bears
cut him before June 1 and do not exercise an option to spread the dead
money over two seasons, the hit for this year would be roughly $6
million. That would be cutting a sizeable slice into the pie that’s
meant to go to *Tommie Harris*, *Devin Hester*, *Robbie Gould* and
others in the form of longterm extensions.
If the Bears did a post-June 1 cut, or cut him now and had the money go
on the books as a post-June 1 cut, they would still be on the books for
more than $2.5 million this season when subtracting out his base pay of
$820,000 for 2008.
However, Benson’s contract contains a *conditional injury guarantee* for
that base pay and he could claim his release was due to the broken left
leg suffered last November against Denver. Of course, the team could
claim he was healthy and off the parties could go into a grievance that
would drag on and on. The guarantee, in effect, would mean he would cost
the team the full $3.335 million against the camp whether he’s on the
roster or not this season. You'd have to like the chances of a running
back in a hearing who can show he's had a plate and screws inserted into
his leg and ankle.
In 2009, Benson’s cap number is $3.535 million, and his base pay climbs
to $1,020,000. That base pay includes a partial guarantee of $910,000 in
he event of injury, but that’s only for an injury occurring in the prior
contract year. So, it would not apply here, but the remaining $2.515
million would be dead money vs. the cap in 2009.
So, however you want to slice it, whether Benson is a Bear or not, he
will count against the salary cap. Sending him away isn’t going to
create any savings at all.
And let me throw this one out there ... the ongoing discussions with
Harris, Hester and Gould are well documented. The Bears had discussions
with representatives for all three players in advance of the draft. I'm
not saying it's going to happen, but the Bears have had a way in the
past of finding some good news to trump bad P.R.
There would be no faster way to steal headlines away from the running
back who has 10 career touchdowns to show for a *McCaskey* investment of
$13.8 million thus far than to trot Harris or Hester out in front of a
Halas Hall podium and sing the praises of a longterm contract.
Stay tuned.
--
The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is to fill the world with fools.
- Herbert Spencer
More information about the CBFF
mailing list