[CBFF] [Fwd: Are Bears interested in Dominic Rhodes?]
Tom Shannon
tshanno at gmail.com
Thu May 8 07:32:12 MDT 2008
Yeah, I didn't get around to reading this until this morning. I'm sure
it went up on their site yesterday before the signing.
Tom S
--
Ryan Dietzenbach wrote:
>
> I heard Rhodes signed with Indianapolis.
>
> RD
>
> On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 3:47 AM, Tom Shannon <tshanno at gmail.com
> <mailto:tshanno at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
> http://www.chicagobears.com/news/ChalkTalkStory.asp?STORY_ID=4673
>
> *You're probably getting this question a lot, but are you picking
> up on
> any interest in Dominic Rhodes? Given Cedric Benson's history of
> injuries and recent arrest, it seems like a veteran would provide good
> insurance at the position.
> *
> Jeff T.
> /Middlesex, Vermont/
>
> I can't argue with your point about a veteran bolstering the running
> back position, but I'm not sure that Dominic Rhodes is the answer.
> He is
> a talented player as he showed in Indianapolis' Super Bowl win
> over the
> Bears, but there's a reason the Raiders chose to release him while
> keeping Justin Fargas and LaMont Jordan after drafting Darren
> McFadden.
> Plus there are character concerns with Rhodes. He was arrested and
> charged with domestic battery in 2002 and drunk driving in 2007,
> and he
> was also suspended for the first four games of last season for
> violating
> the NFL's substance abuse policy. As far as Benson goes, I'm more
> concerned about the four injuries he's sustained than his recent
> arrest
> for a misdemeanor offense. He must prove that he can stay healthy
> before
> he ever develops into the type of back the Bears envisioned when they
> drafted him.
>
> *With the recent signing of undrafted free agent running back Matt
> Lawrence, does that mean the Bears are leaning towards cutting Cedric
> Benson?*
>
> Beau R.
> /Richland, Washington/
>
> The signing of running back Matt Lawrence is not related in any way to
> Cedric Benson's status with the team. The Bears typically sign a few
> players who participate in their rookie minicamp on a tryout basis and
> this was no different. They also signed a punter, defensive end, guard
> and tight end.
>
> *If the Buccaneers release Chris Simms, do you think he would be a
> good
> fit for the Bears?*
>
> Jeremy B.
> /Davenport, Iowa/
>
> It's hard to say. Chris Simms hasn't played since he ruptured his
> spleen
> in a 2006 game and he was only average at best before he sustained the
> injury. Selected in the same 2003 draft as Bears quarterback Rex
> Grossman, Simms has played in only 19 games with 15 starts, completing
> 59.1 percent of his passes for 3,087 yards with 12 TDs, 17
> interceptions
> and a 71.2 passer rating. With that being said, I'm sure the Bears
> will
> at least discuss the possibility of signing Chris Simms if and when he
> is released by the Buccaneers. But at this point I think there's a
> better chance that they will try to develop a rookie such as Caleb
> Hanie
> or Nick Hill as the No. 3 quarterback behind Grossman and Kyle Orton
> this season.
>
> --
> Another unsettling element in modern art is that common symptom of
> immaturity, the dread of doing what has been done before.
> - Edith Wharton
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CBFF Homepage and Blog:
> http://chicagobearsfanforum.com <http://chicagobearsfanforum.com/>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> CBFF Homepage and Blog:
> http://chicagobearsfanforum.com
>
--
Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain.
- Friedrich von Schiller
More information about the CBFF
mailing list